***HELP ICSC PROMOTE CLIMATE AND ENERGY REALISM!***

Donate using PayPal
Amount:
Note:
MONCKTON BLOWS OUT THE HOUSE AT LAS VEGAS CLIMATE CONFERENCE

July 23, 2014: Watch ICSC Policy Advisory Board member Lord Christopher Monckton, Viscount of Brenchley, Carie, Rannoch, Scotland, awe the audience in Las Vegas and receive an award.

Click here to watch Monckton's talk, arguably the best presentation at The Heartland Institute's 9th International Conference on Climate Change, which took place on July 7-9, 2014 in Las Vegas, Nevada, U.S.A.

Click on above image to watch Lord Monckon's presentation and award ceremony.


 
LEFT-LEANING ACADEMICS SELLING OUT ON CLIMATE CHANGE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 
PRESENTERS FROM UPCOMING SKEPTICS CONFERENCE DEBUNK CLIMATISM

July 3, 2014: "ICCC-9 presenters demolish President Obama's climate dogma", radio interview with ICSC Science Advisory Board member Dr. Tim Ball and ICSC Executive Director Tom Harris, Ottawa, Canada.

Listen (and watch via YouTube) to climatologist Dr. Ball and Mr. Harris take apart the climate scare on CFRA Radio in Ottawa, Canada. Both will be speaking at the ICCC9, The Heartland Institute's 9th International Conference on Climate Change in Las Vegas, 7-9 July, 2014.

Also note that Austrian rapper and social crusader, Kilez More, who is highlighted in the above video, will be preforming at ICCC-9 starting at about 9 pm on July 7.


 
OBAMA CLEAN POWER PLAN A DISINGENUOUS "SLEIGHT OF HAND"

June 3, 2014: "Climate Policy Claptrap", ICSC Executive Director Tom Harris dissects Obama Administration "Clean Power Plan" (CPP) issued on June 2.

  • CPP will have negligible impact on climate, EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy admits here.
  • CPP has no limits imposed on soot or the precursors to smog. Obama is relying on an EPA mistake known as 'co-benefits - see here for a description of this scam.
  • Costs will be enormous - see here.

 

Watch interview by clicking on image to the right.


 
CLIMATE CHANGE 'CONSENSUS' A DANGEROUS LIE

May 27, 2014: "The Myth of the Climate Change '97%' - What is the origin of the false belief—constantly repeated—that almost all scientists agree about global warming?", by Joe Bast, president of the Heartland Institute, and Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist for the University of Alabama in Huntsville and the U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer on NASA's Aqua satellite, first published in The Wall Street Journal, New York City, U.S.A.

"Last week Secretary of State John Kerry warned graduating students at Boston College of the "crippling consequences" of climate change. "Ninety-seven percent of the world's scientists," he added, "tell us this is urgent."

"Where did Mr. Kerry get the 97% figure? Perhaps from his boss, President Obama, who tweeted on May 16 that "Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree: #climate change is real, man-made and dangerous." Or maybe from NASA, which posted (in more measured language) on its website:

"Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities."

"Yet the assertion that 97% of scientists believe that climate change is a man-made, urgent problem is a fiction. The so-called consensus comes from a handful of surveys and abstract-counting exercises that have been contradicted by more reliable research."

Read whole piece on "The Hockey Schtick".


 
BOTTOM FALLING OUT OF THE SCIENTIFIC CASE FOR DANGEROUS HUMAN-CAUSED CLIMATE CHANGE

May 20, 2014: "Corbella: Pause in global warming upsets religious believers", by Licia Corbella, columnist and the editorial page editor, Calgary Herald, Calgary, Alberta. The presentation by Professor McKitrick was delivered at the Friends of Science 11th Annual Luncheon on May 13, 2014.

“This is the real issue,” says McKitrick. “At the point when the modelers could no longer peek at the answer, they started getting it wrong. Significantly wrong.”

Between 1990 and 2014, CO2 levels increased by 13 per cent. The climate models all agree on what should have happened, which is why the climate religionists at the CRU wanted to cook the books to “hide the decline.”

Fully 111 out of 114 models touted by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicted too much warming.

 

The models predicted warming of 0.21 C per decade — which is more than four times the actual observed level.

As Hans von Storch of the Institute of Coastal Sciences in Germany stated recently: “If things continue as they have been, in five years, at the latest, we will need to acknowledge that something is fundamentally wrong with our climate models. A 20-year pause in global warming does not occur in a single modelled scenario,” said von Storch, a renowned “consensus” climate scientist.

Indeed, last year, von Storch said: “We’re facing a puzzle. Recent CO2 emissions have actually risen even more steeply than we feared. As a result, according to most climate models, we should have seen temperatures rise by around 0.25 degrees Celsius over the past 10 years. That hasn’t happened. In fact, the increase over the last 15 years was just 0.06 degrees Celsius — a value very close to zero.”

Read whole piece by Ms. Corbella.

Read Friends of Science news release advertising this presentation.

Read Friends of Science news release after the event.


 
More Articles...