LEFT-LEANING ACADEMICS SELLING OUT ON CLIMATE CHANGE
PRESENTERS FROM UPCOMING SKEPTICS CONFERENCE DEBUNK CLIMATISM
July 3, 2014: "ICCC-9 presenters demolish President Obama's climate dogma", radio interview with ICSC Science Advisory Board member Dr. Tim Ball and ICSC Executive Director Tom Harris, Ottawa, Canada.
Listen (and watch via YouTube) to climatologist Dr. Ball and Mr. Harris take apart the climate scare on CFRA Radio in Ottawa, Canada. Both will be speaking at the ICCC9, The Heartland Institute's 9th International Conference on Climate Change in Las Vegas, 7-9 July, 2014.
Watch interview by clicking on image to the right.
CLIMATE CHANGE 'CONSENSUS' A DANGEROUS LIE
May 27, 2014: "The Myth of the Climate Change '97%' - What is the origin of the false belief—constantly repeated—that almost all scientists agree about global warming?", by Joe Bast, president of the Heartland Institute, and Dr. Roy Spencer, a principal research scientist for the University of Alabama in Huntsville and the U.S. Science Team Leader for the Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer on NASA's Aqua satellite, first published in The Wall Street Journal, New York City, U.S.A.
"Last week Secretary of State John Kerry warned graduating students at Boston College of the "crippling consequences" of climate change. "Ninety-seven percent of the world's scientists," he added, "tell us this is urgent."
"Where did Mr. Kerry get the 97% figure? Perhaps from his boss, President Obama, who tweeted on May 16 that "Ninety-seven percent of scientists agree: #climate change is real, man-made and dangerous." Or maybe from NASA, which posted (in more measured language) on its website:
"Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities."
"Yet the assertion that 97% of scientists believe that climate change is a man-made, urgent problem is a fiction. The so-called consensus comes from a handful of surveys and abstract-counting exercises that have been contradicted by more reliable research."
“This is the real issue,” says McKitrick. “At the point when the modelers could no longer peek at the answer, they started getting it wrong. Significantly wrong.”
Between 1990 and 2014, CO2 levels increased by 13 per cent. The climate models all agree on what should have happened, which is why the climate religionists at the CRU wanted to cook the books to “hide the decline.”
Fully 111 out of 114 models touted by the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicted too much warming.
The models predicted warming of 0.21 C per decade — which is more than four times the actual observed level.
As Hans von Storch of the Institute of Coastal Sciences in Germany stated recently: “If things continue as they have been, in five years, at the latest, we will need to acknowledge that something is fundamentally wrong with our climate models. A 20-year pause in global warming does not occur in a single modelled scenario,” said von Storch, a renowned “consensus” climate scientist.
Indeed, last year, von Storch said: “We’re facing a puzzle. Recent CO2 emissions have actually risen even more steeply than we feared. As a result, according to most climate models, we should have seen temperatures rise by around 0.25 degrees Celsius over the past 10 years. That hasn’t happened. In fact, the increase over the last 15 years was just 0.06 degrees Celsius — a value very close to zero.”